JP Morgan v. Brown
The Indiana Court of Appeals entered an order of interest to collection attorneys today on the topic of attempts to garnish bank accounts.
In the case of JP Morgan v. Brown, a judgment creditor filed bank interrogatories in the course of a proceeding supplemental. The garnishee bank responded that the judgment debtor had a balance of $20.61. Subsequently, the judgment debtor deposited $1,004.77 to the account. The garnishment order that issued instructed the garnishee bank to turn over up to the judgment amount. The bank did not turn over the additional amounts, the bank was held in contempt of the garnishment order, and judgment was entered against the bank. The case is unclear as to whether or how much the garnishee bank remitted and if and when the judgment debtor withdrew those funds, but, in any case, the court held that the bank is not responsible for restricting funds deposited after the garnishee bank receives notice of the garnishment proceedings. The reasoning for this is that in 1998, the legislature amended the statute and one of the changes made was to omit a specification that the bank restrict withdrawal of funds subsequently deposited into the account. There is also an interesting digression about whether a magistrate’s contempt order can constitute a final, appealable order.